Jonah Goldberg, in National Review, with some great insights on Huckabee and Paul. For the brief excerpts I'll post here, I'll focus on his remarks about Huckabee.
What’s so scary about Huckabee? Personally, nothing. He seems a charming, decent, friendly, pious man. What’s troubling about The Man From Hope 2.0 is what he represents. Huckabee represents compassionate conservatism on steroids....
For example, Huckabee would support a nationwide ban on public smoking. Why? Because he’s on a health kick, thinks smoking is bad and believes the government should do the right thing.
And therein lies the chief difference between Paul and Huckabee. One is a culturally conservative libertarian. The other is a right-wing progressive...
In this respect, Huckabee’s philosophy is conventionally liberal, or progressive. What he wants government to do certainly differs in important respects from what Hillary Clinton wants, but the limits he would place on governmental do-goodery are primarily tactical or practical, not philosophical or constitutional. This isn’t to say he — or Hillary — is a would-be tyrant, but simply to note that the progressive notion of the state as a loving, caring parent is becoming a bipartisan affair.
Indeed, Huckabee represents the latest attempt to make conservatism more popular. Contrary to the conventional belief that Republicans need to drop their opposition to abortion, gay marriage and the like in order to be popular, Huckabee understands that the unpopular stuff is the economic libertarianism: free trade and smaller government. That’s why we’re seeing a rise in economic populism on the right married to a culturally conservative populism. Huckabee is the bastard child of Lou Dobbs and Pat Robertson....
I would not vote for Paul mostly because I think his foreign policy would be disastrous (Also, he’d lose in a rout not seen since Bambi versus Godzilla). But there’s something weird going on when Paul, the small-government constitutionalist, is considered the extremist in the Republican party, while Huckabee, the statist, is the lovable underdog. It’s even weirder because it’s probably true: Huckabee is much closer to the mainstream. And that’s what scares me about Huckabee and the mainstream alike.
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(73)
-
▼
November
(29)
- Republicans enjoy better mental health than Democrats
- Yoo-Hoo!! Aren't we under attack?
- From KY with love: more subsidies for corporations...
- TEACHERS UNION OPPOSES PROPERTY TAX REFORM
- Huckabee takes a beating from Novak
- Admitting the difficulty of nation-building and re...
- My analysis of Gov. Daniels' poll numbers
- The Suffering of Columbus
- Democrats as the political party representing the ...
- Mike Huckabee on immigration
- Huckabee's Achilles hill: Illegal immigration
- Bella!
- There's nuthin' better...
- Sodrel and (Hill) on property taxes
- Why is there any debate?
- Huckabee (and Paul) surge in Iowa
- Winning the war vs. building a nation
- Goldberg on Huckabee and Paul
- All my heros are black men
- Ten things you can't say in America
- The Ideal America
- Here’s a four part series of articles by the Green...
- Murder charged in unborn baby's death
- If supply-side is good enough for formerly communi...
- PROPERTY TAX REVOLT
- No Farmer Left Behind...
- Pelosi remarkably candid...
- Global warming primer
- Who really pay the most taxes???
-
▼
November
(29)
No comments:
Post a Comment